Facing History and Ourselves

Race and Membership

Eugenics in America : Persuasion and Propaganda







The "science" called eugenics that Francis Galton had created in England would not receive mainstream attention beyond academic circles until it moved across the sea to the United States. A variety of factors -- a massive influx of of immigrants, a domestic migration of African Americans from the South to the North, urbanization, a huge increase in enrollment in public schools, a growing awareness of public health issues, the beginning of mass marketing -- would converge in the late 1800s and early 1900s to create a fertile environment for eugenics propaganda.



There were two approaches to the marketing of Eugenic ideas: positive eugenics and negative eugenics. Positive eugenics promoted increasing the reproduction of good types, while negative eugenics promoted decreasing reproduction of bad types. Posters showing the "ideal" man or woman as prime examples of the benefits of bringing eugenics theory into practice are classic instances of positive eugenics. Such rhetoric preyed on some basic human desires and insecurities. Another example of positive eugenics was the use of "Fitter Family" contests at state fairs (see SideNote). Eugenic "experts" would conduct interviews with families to determine the "merits" of their familial gene lines. The winners would receive an award and their photo might appear in the newspaper.

Negative eugenics preyed even more on people's insecurities. Using this approach, the poster, exhibit, pamphlet, etc., would concentrate on the inferior--the weak and "feebleminded"--as a menace to American society and values and a threat to the future well-being of our country. Those labeled "feebleminded" or "moronic" might be displayed as caricatures in posters or literature (see the images above-right).

The success of the marketing campaign of the early eugenics movement in the United States lay in the ability to reach people on a mass level. Staging exhibits at state fairs (like movie theaters or sporting events today, state fairs drew huge numbers of attendees) was an extremely effective way to communicate to the masses.




Eugenics and Apple Pie
"Fitter Family Contests," as shown in the image gallery above (image 3 of 9), were not the only types of eugenics contests held at fairgrounds across America. Eugenicists also offered prizes to the "best baby" and to young couples about to embark on a "eugenic marriage." School children were ranked not only according to their intelligence but also their mental outlook, height, dental hygiene, vision, and hearing. For example, a child whose height deviated in either direction from the Hastings' Age-Height Tables, which stated the "normal height" for a child at a particular age, received a low score. There was even a contest for the best eugenics sermon. About 300 ministers and rabbis participated by preparing special sermons for the contest.




Facing History Resources
Race and Membership in American History: The Eugenics Movement (Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc., Brookline, Massachusetts) 2002, Chapter 5, "Eugenics and the Power of Testing." The resource book is available for free download by chapter.



Print and Video Resources
The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism by Allan Chase (Alfred A. Knopf, New York) 1976.

The Mismeasure of Man, 2nd Edition by Stephen Jay Gould (W.W. Norton & Company, New York) 1996.




Web Resources
Cold Spring Harbor: American Eugenics Image Archive
(http://vector.cshl.org/eugenics/)








   
privacy policy       Facing History and Ourselves  copyright © 1997 - 2010            RSS